#Fallout new vegas all or nothing professional#

Unless the emails were marked вЂњconfidential,вЂќ вЂњprivateвЂќ or a similar designation, Gruden likely lacked a credible expectation of privacy.

#Fallout new vegas all or nothing professional#

Gruden sent emails to then-WFT president Bruce Allen in the normal course of his professional relationship and friendship. They canвЂ™t be compelled to share sources and have a journalistic duty to preserve confidentiality.Д®ven if Gruden could establish the NFL was responsible, he would face difficulties in mounting a successful legal claim. Meanwhile, Gruden wouldnвЂ™t get assistance from the reporters who obtained copies of his emails. This demand, which threatens to expose NFL business practices and potentially trade secrets, is a direct result of the leaks. The House Committee on Oversight and Reform demands the NFL turn over, by this Thursday, numerous files and clarifying statements about the WFT investigation. Second, leaked materials have undermined the NFLвЂ™s image and damaged its standing with lawmakers.

Pash would be an odd person for the league to target in a leak.

Pash is arguably the second most powerful person in the commissionerвЂ™s office after Goodell, with whom Pash is close. Some have speculated the NFL secretly released the emails to damage Gruden, whose emails ridiculed Goodell (and many others).ДЇor at least a couple of reasons, this speculation is problematic.ДЇirst, controversial emails sent by league executive vice president Jeffrey Pash were also leaked. Such a settlement normally releases each side of potential legal claims against one another, meaning Gruden would likely be barred from suing the team. Gruden reached a settlement with the Raiders to resolve the end of his employment. The league was in custody of the Gruden emails prior to their disclosure, but reporting indicates the Raiders also gained possession. Meanwhile, CBS Sports reports that former Las Vegas Raiders coach Jon Gruden is вЂњmullingвЂќ the possibility of suing the NFL and Goodell after leaks of 10-year-old, bigoted emails resulted in the coachвЂ™s resignation.ДЄ lawsuit by Gruden would face many hurdles.ДЇor starters, itвЂ™s unclear how he could prove that a league official was the leaker. They had reason to fear fallout from violating a non-disclosure agreement with the team. Without indemnification, witnesses might have been less inclined to tell the truth and less willing to share evidence. A person familiar with the WFT investigation told Sportico the NFL refused to indemnify participants, even with a carve-out for claims arising from the wrongdoing of the participant. The NFLвЂ™s sincerity in uncovering facts has similarly attracted skepticism. An 82-page report by an engineering firm retained by the NFL was also made public. In 2015вЂ™s Deflategate controversy, the NFL released the 139-page Wells Report, which contained myriad details gathered from witnesses and leveled sharp accusations against specific people. The league in the past has hardly been averse to issuing written reports. The NFL is sitting on a trove of information, including interviews with more than 150 people and a collection of 650,000 emails.В While the league fined WFT $10 million in July, it declined to issue suspensions or strip draft picks, and eschewed sharing a written report about the investigation.

While breaches of assurances could prompt witnesses to sue the NFL, Banks stressed that sharing investigatory information is not an all-or-nothing proposition-that some details could be made public without betraying confidence and that redacted accounts could provide information without identifying victims.